Although a Clinton-era Supreme Court case, allows presidents to be sued for conduct which occurred before the start of their time in the White House, Mr Trump’s legal team asked the Department of Justice to aid in his defence.

Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/e-jean-carroll-trial-trump-lawsuit-b2322554.html

At least one defendant, Ethan Seitz, asked his trial-level judge to cancel his sentencing hearing set for January because of the Supreme Court case that’s now pending.

Source: https://krdo.com/news/2023/12/13/supreme-court-to-hear-appeal-from-indicted-january-6-rioter/

I was surprised that there was no acknowledgment of the 2020 Supreme Court case McGirt v. Oklahoma.

Source: https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Readers-Respond/2023/0826/Readers-write-The-power-of-community-from-Maine-to-California?icid=rss

The attorney said it is important to take note of the Supreme Court case with the National Identification System (NIDS), which revealed that an element of any forceful extraction of body fluid may collide with the constitutional rights to privacy.

Source: https://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/lead-stories/20230430/dna-taken-force

The discussion featured perspectives from the legal, health care and educational intersections of the landmark Supreme Court case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which ended the constitutional right to abortion last year.

Source: https://tuftsdaily.com/news/2023/04/05/excollege-event-explores-reproductive-rights-in-a-post-roe-world/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=excollege-event-explores-reproductive-rights-in-a-post-roe-world&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign

“The principles we have used in analyzing the Bill were stated in the Supreme Court case of David Wesley Tusingwire vs. Attorney General, Constitutional Appeal No.4 of 2016.

Source: https://www.africanews.it/english/uganda-protect-freedoms-and-rights-in-anti-gay-bill-lawyers/

They emphasize that a president’s official acts aren’t 'examinable by the Judicial Branch,' a principle that extends back to the landmark 1803 Supreme Court case Marbury vs. Madison.

Source: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-immunity-2666808321/

“Those admissions are unconstitutional for all other public institutions of higher education,” the lawsuit contends, citing Students for Fair Admissions’ successful summer Supreme Court case against Harvard University and the University of North Carolina.

Source: https://nypost.com/2023/09/19/west-point-accused-of-discriminating-against-white-applicants-lawsuit/

Those fears were justified until several tweaks by Congress during the Trump administration, and a critical Supreme Court case diluted the power of CFPB to micro-manage loan approvals and stock trades.

Source: https://pjmedia.com/uncategorized/rick-moran/2023/02/22/federal-court-rules-consumer-finance-regulatory-bureau-cant-ban-bad-mouthing-minority-neighborhoods-n1672833