But Eddins then proceeded to take a far different tack, one that references the landmark 14th Amendment of 1868 on due process and equal protection and then identifies a number of recent SCOTUS decisions with which he strongly dissents.

Source: https://www.civilbeat.org/2023/11/chad-blair-two-hawaii-supreme-court-justices-are-speaking-out/

It simply allows justices who want to do so to register dissents.

Source: https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/comment-supreme-court-only-put-off-ruling-on-abortion-pill/

The bulk and concurring opinions centered on affirmative motion’s downsides for white and Asian college students, whereas the dissents centered on the advantages to Black and Latino college students.

Source: https://www.mccourier.com/the-end-of-affirmative-action/