Synonyms that are in the dictionary are marked in green. Synonyms that are not in the dictionary are marked in red.
Antonyms that are in the dictionary are marked in green. Antonyms that are not in the dictionary are marked in red.
After retiring from the army in 2013, Roberts-Smith had done an MBA and traded his $120,000-a-year soldier’s pay packet for a $700,000 package as Queensland manager of the Seven Network.
Ex-soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has agreed to hand over $910,000 in security to continue his defamation appeal over a series of news reports.
Source: https://citynews.com.au/2023/and-once-again-youre-welcome-canberra/
Last Friday Justice Anthony Besanko, after a year-long trial, found that the major allegations made by the papers – that Roberts-Smith is a murderer, a criminal and a bully – were proven to the civil standard of the balance of probabilities.
Source: https://www.observerxtra.com/australias-take-on-war-crimes-and-justice/
More generally, the incidents for which Roberts-Smith received commendations, and for which he stands accused of war crimes, were interlinked.
Roberts-Smith, faced with relentless heavy machine gun fire, killed three insurgents with little regard for his own safety.
The broadcaster had used the occasion to praise VC recipient Ben Roberts-Smith as 'an outstanding Australian' and predicted 'they will never, ever find anything against him'.
The court also found Roberts-Smith was complicit in the murder of Afghan farmer Ali Jan at Darwan in 2012.
The defence has argued that soldiers who gave evidence against Roberts-Smith were gossips, motivated by greed and jealousy.
Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/6/1/australia-braces-for-judgement-in-war-crimes-defamation-case
Victoria Cross winner Ben Roberts-Smith during his days in Afghanistan.
Source: https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/2023/06/02/roberts-smith-war-crimes-afghanistan/
Yet as the of the judgment reveals, the Roberts-Smith case underscores the enduring significance of truth for public interest journalism and also the as a defamation defence, despite the fact that it is costly, complex and difficult to prove.