Synonyms that are in the dictionary are marked in green. Synonyms that are not in the dictionary are marked in red.
Antonyms that are in the dictionary are marked in green. Antonyms that are not in the dictionary are marked in red.
A letter signed by senior executives of pharmaceutical and biotech companies condemned a ruling by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk that invalidated the Food and Drug Administration’s 23-year-old approval of the abortion pill mifepristone.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/10/health/abortion-ruling-pharma-executives.html
At the same time, a ruling in favor of the plaintiffs would align with a series of controversial decisions by Kacsmaryk since his appointment to the bench by former President Donald Trump in 2019.
By filing their case in Amarillo, the plaintiffs assured it would go before Kacsmaryk, a conservative and former Christian activist, and that any appeal would go the conservative 5th Circuit.
C.) has been trying to pull her party back to the center on abortion, going so far as to suggest the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ignore the ruling by federal Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk that would rescind the agency’s approval of the abortion pill.
Source: https://jezebel.com/abortion-isnt-even-a-top-5-issue-for-republican-primary-1850337590
Dahlia and Mark also discuss why the abortion pill banning Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk is all of a sudden so worried about misogyny.
For now, mifepristone remains accessible because Kacsmaryk gave the federal government seven days to appeal his ruling.
If District Court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk strikes down that approval, siding with The Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, it could block an estimated 40 million women from accessing abortion care even in states that protect access to abortion.
Source: https://www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2023/02/10/utah-ag-sean-reyes-joins-legal/
If Kacsmaryk reverses the approval of mifepristone, it could restrict access nationwide.
In 2014, Kacsmaryk joined the First Liberty Institute, which calls itself the “largest legal organization in the nation dedicated exclusively to defending religious liberty for all Americans.”
Source: https://ktar.com/story/5481876/abortion-pill-order-latest-contentious-ruling-by-texas-judge/
“In September 2000, FDA abandoned its safety proposals and acquiesced to the objections of the Population Council and Danco,” Kacsmaryk wrote.
Source: https://www.wnd.com/2023/04/republican-congresswoman-biden-fda-ignore-judges-abortion-pill-ruling/
It’s notable that Paxton chose to bring this case in Lubbock, where he was likely to draw Hendrix as his judge, rather than bringing this suit before Kacsmaryk or Tipton (Kacsmaryk hears 100 percent of federal cases filed in Amarillo, Texas.
It’s notable that Paxton chose to bring this case in Lubbock, where he was likely to draw Hendrix as his judge, rather than bringing this suit before Kacsmaryk or Tipton (Kacsmaryk hears 100 percent of federal cases filed in Amarillo, Texas.
Judge Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee who has written critically of the Roe v. Wade decision, had stayed his order for seven days to give the F.D.A. time to appeal.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/13/health/abortion-pill-ruling-appeal.html
Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued the ruling on April 7, ordering the FDA to stay its approval of mifepristone.
Kacsmaryk stayed his own order for seven days to give the federal government time to file an appeal, which it has already done.
Kacsmaryk wrote in his decision that at most, the FDA could have lawfully approved mifepristone “for cases where a pregnant woman’s life or health is in danger,” but “even a limited approval of this sort would still not render pregnancy an ‘illness.'
Mr Kacsmaryk said the rules did not differentiate between gay people who were celibate and those who made it a “lifestyle.”
On Friday in Texas, U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ruled that the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of mifepristone should be put on hold,…
“Several popular methods of birth control carry serious side effects,” Kacsmaryk wrote, later quoting from Planned Parenthood educational material that read, “Complications are rare, but they can be serious.
Source: https://truthout.org/articles/judge-could-rule-to-halt-nationwide-sales-of-common-abortion-pill/
The actual substance of the argument highlighted how the anti-abortion doctors who brought the case to Kacsmaryk shouldn't even have standing to do so.